News from the Trenches · 11 June 2026

The selling ape

We have all witnessed a person whose meetings with senior healthcare stakeholders just go differently.

Decisionmakers open up to them. The doctor who gives everyone else four minutes leans in and starts thinking out loud. Nothing about it looks like technique. There is no visible “thing” they do you can copy. Watching it, the famous line comes to mind: the force is strong in this one. And like the force, nobody can quite say where it lives or how it got there.

The selling ape

Reading another mind and offering it something worth having is not a modern sales invention, it is some of the oldest mental equipment we all carry with us. Adam Smith called it the propensity to truck, barter and exchange, and treated it as close to a defining human trait. The biology underneath it is older still. We evolved in small groups that ran on reciprocity, on favours remembered, on a constant read of who could be trusted and who was about to take more than they gave. The ones that survived was the ones good at it.

So a feel for how to influence someone else is not rare, it is standard issue. The strong rep reading a room is running the same software a person runs sitting next to a difficult dinner guest or in a negotiation they never trained for. We are all a selling ape. Some of us have just let the ape get more practice.

Where the intuition actually comes from

The instinct is not magic, even when it looks like it. It has two layers.

The deep layer is inherited. The wiring for reading people and trading with them came as standard issue, the way language did. Nobody arrives in the world blank.

The top layer is earned, and this is the hopeful part for company representatives. Intuition is compiled experience. Kahneman and Klein, who disagreed about most things, agreed about this. A gut feeling can be trusted when two conditions are met. The environment has to be regular enough to hold real patterns, and the feedback has to be fast and clear enough to teach you what they are. Meet both and the instinct grows into something close to expertise. Miss either and it stays a beginner’s guess no matter how many years pass.

This is what separates the best from the rest – the internalization of thousands of small, corrected moments until it runs faster than conscious thought. The force may look like a lucky gene strike but most of it is just repetition.

There is even a name for the instinct in motion. Researchers have studied it since the 1980s as adaptive selling, the degree to which someone changes their behaviour mid conversation based on what they read, rather than running a fixed routine. Weitz and the Sujans defined it, Spiro and Weitz built the scale still used to measure it, and the finding holds across the decades. The people who read the room and adjust beat the people who deliver the same call every time.

The models are the unnatural part

Now hold adaptive selling next to SPIN and Challenger.

Those models are useful. They scale, they keep a regulated field force consistent, and they give a newcomer a handrail before the instinct has compiled.

But notice what they are. A fixed sequence of questions, a prescribed posture, teach, tailor, take control. They are something you apply to a person, a routine imported from outside and laid over the conversation. Adaptive selling is the opposite shape. It has no sequence. It is something you do with a person, driven entirely by what you are reading in front of you, moment to moment.

A model is a map of a road. The instinct is knowing how to drive. The map helps the day you do not know the area. It becomes a problem the day you keep your eyes on the map instead of on the road, and that is exactly what a script does to a meeting. It points your attention at the next step instead of at the human across the table. The signal your instinct needs to feed on is in that person’s face, and the script keeps pulling your eyes away from it.

How to grow the force

If intuition is compiled experience, you grow it by giving it experience it can actually learn from. Here are three things that will take you a long way.

Feed it before the meeting. The gifted rep is not improvising from nothing. They have done the homework on the account, on what this stakeholder is actually struggling with, on where the patients fall out of the pathway. That preparation is the raw material the instinct works with live. Walk in cold and there is nothing for it to read against.

Put a hypothesis in the open. From the homework, form a point of view about their problem and bring it to the surface, not as a claim, as a question. Do you see it the same way? The stakeholder corrects you, adds the part you could not have known, and the read sharpens in real time. That exchange is the single fastest way to train the instinct, because it closes the loop on the spot.

Then actually close the loop afterwards. You need to establish some kind of feedback condition for your self. What happened after that meeting, and what in your mind was right or wrong. The reps who do this quietly turn years of vague experience into intuition. The ones who do not stay beginners with long tenure.

A note to you, reading this

If you follow the script faithfully and still wonder why the stakeholder never opens, here is the likely answer: You are being too much robot and too little ape.

If you are following some kind of engagement or sales model, it’s very likely the model is in the way. Put it down for one meeting. Do the homework, walk in with an hypothesis instead of a sequence, watch the face instead of the next step, and find out afterwards what really happened. Do that many times and the force you have seen in someone else starts showing up in you.

Trust the ape in you. He is right most of the time.

One article a week. In your inbox.

News from the Trenches: access, engagement and account work in pharma. Unsubscribe any time.